-
Posts
596 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Everything posted by curt
-
Pres I like your question and understand that my comments here are offered in the spirit of provocative analysis rather than attempting to invalidate the issue. Maybe I don’t need to say this, but this topic may be emotive for some. Theft is a pretty strong term. Almost makes it seem like there was something private that you have taken away from the owner without permission. I do not view cultural symbols, icons or art in this way. They are in fact public, meant to be seen, acknowledged and interpreted by others. Further, “cultural theft” may almost be a contradiction in terms. Culture cannot be owned. On the contrary, it is a shared construct. Its manifestations are an invitation from insiders to outsiders to engage and participate. A culture’s ability to survive and thrive depends critically on its ability to be communicated and understood - and potentially adopted, or adapted - by those coming to it for the first time. Those treating culture like a secret birthright that only the high priests can discuss are missing the point. Success is where everyone is discussing it, learning it, sharing it. However, since art is a primary vehicle for communcating culture, using imagery or symbols from a culture other than your own in your artwork, possibly out of (cultural) context, is risky business. If misused, or possibly even when appropriately used, it could be misinterpreted, or seem like a cliche’, or possibly offend those who (legitimately) identify with those symbols as part of their own personal value system. A bit akin to driving without a license, or sufficient training or experience - you probably just shouldn’t be out there. Objects may be closer than they appear.
-
I pug clay. There is no pressure. Nothing that must be done. No finish line. No phones, no computers, no TV. No control. The pug mill tells me how fast to go, gently ignoring any pleas to go faster... Just lovely plastic handfuls of clay, Iike the first time you touched it. In. Out. In. Out. In. Out. The mineral earth smell, cold and damp, squeezing through my fingers. Slap into the hopper. Down comes the plunger, extra force applied right to the bottom to leave no doubt about who is really in charge of everything in this little world. Endless, rhythmic repetition (cut, smash, cut smash, cut smash), the low steady drone of the motor, the slow but inevitable extrusion of perfect worms, again, and again. ... hypnotic....like a wheel going round...and round.... ...the mind wanders, ... sequences of thoughts lead strangely down side paths. Ideas occur, new but vaguely familiar, coming from somewhere like things that happen in a dream. Forms appear in your minds eye, once known, then forgotten and now rediscovered... have hours passed or only minutes? No idea. Cut slap smash. It goes on. You are far away now. a distant call to dinner shakes you awake.. back to earth. switch off the pugmill. As the dream fades you quickly you scribble down a few thoughts, rough out a shape or two... tomorrow is another day. As you drift off you know fresh pugs of clay wait silently in a neat stack, filled with possibility, daring you to try something new...
-
However, understand that “dry” doesn’t necessarily mean leaving a pot just sitting out on a shelf somewhere. If you live in a climate that cycles through wet and dry seasons, and cold and hot temperatures extremes, humidity levels in the air can also move up and down substantially over time. This affects things made out of clay which have not yet been fired. Dry pots absorb and desorb lots of water from humidity in the air, through the small channels in and around clay particles. Unfired clay effectively inhales and exhales humidity over time. Think of it a bit like a rigid sponge. This matters because clay shrinks and swells as it’s water content changes. While most of the shrinking happens in the day or two after we take a pot off the wheel, shrinking and swelling stresses are still at work in a small but meaningful way even when we think of the pot as “dry”. And different temperatures also promote water movement, in the pot as a whole, and also in different parts of the same pot. Humidity fluctuations may or may not matter, depending on your clay body and what is in it. Big, gutsy clay bodies which are relatively “open” ie a good range of large and small particles sizes with grog, silica sand or other aggregate strengtheners, along with sufficient colloidal material may have very good “dry” strength. Fine porcelain bodies have larger smaller particles, greater surface area, and smaller pore channels, but little in the way of aggregates to strengthen the body, and can be more fragile. Different clay body ingredients can also impact how well a clay body withstands humidity cycling. Sodium Bentonite, for instance, which shrinks and swells dramatically, is a common clay body plasticiser, and small colloidal particles like this are actually the main source of green strength in dry pots. It is mostly not a a problem since our clay bodies have so little of it, but should not be forgotten, as some bodies lean on bentonite more heavily. Ball clay shrinks and swells less than bentonite, but there is usually a lot more of it than bentonite in clay bodies we use. Point of all of this is that pots can be negatively impacted by humidity cycling, and to a lesser extent temperature cycling, causing weakness, cracks which show up later during glaze firing, and in extreme circumstances even dry pots disintegrating where they sit. The longer you leave them exposed, the greater the risk. The extreme version of all this would be if your studio is in a rainforest, and you leave a pot on top of the kiln you fire every couple of weeks, and which is also exposed to the sun on one side. That should be the perfect storm. Moral of the story is if you want your dry pots to last and fire OK later, try to avoid putting them through conditions like this.
-
basic ash on open-bodied medium iron stoneware
curt posted a gallery image in Browse Member Galleries
From the album: ian currie test tiles
basic ash on open bodied medium iron stoneware with large particle size, possibly underfired, meant to be cone 10, probably reached cone 8 or 9? -
From the album: ian currie test tiles
basic ash on iron speckled stoneware, underfired, meant to be cone 10, probably cone 6? -
From the album: ian currie test tiles
basic ash on white stoneware, underfired. meant to be cone 10, probably actually cone 6? -
From the album: ian currie test tiles
Cone 10 reduction Left - new mix on speckled iron stoneware Centre - original mix on speckled iron stoneware Right - original mix on white stoneware -
Bubbles In Black Stoneware
curt replied to dazzlepottery's topic in Studio Operations and Making Work
If none of the above works, try a one hour soak at around 800C (1470F) during the bisque firing. If organic matter in the clay is the problem, that is when it burns out (and is also before almost anything else in the clay starts melting or ceramic change starts happening). Make sure the kiln lid is cracked or all bungs are out, since the organic burnout process needs plenty of air to get completed.- 45 replies
-
- black stoneware
- stoneware
- (and 5 more)
-
Cone 10 Currie Tile with Oilspots On White Body - Oxidation
curt posted a gallery image in Browse Member Galleries
From the album: ian currie test tiles
-
Cone 10 Curie Tile with Oilspots On Iron body in Oxidation
curt posted a gallery image in Browse Member Galleries
From the album: ian currie test tiles
-
red porcelain coffee cup at 800x magnification
curt commented on curt's gallery image in Browse Member Galleries
Hi Nerd, yes seeing bubbles is pretty much all glazes. see a thread started by Joel called Bubble Bubble Toil and Trouble if you haven't already. I make a lot of comments about my own bubble research and observations there. Yes, scale is critical - bubbles below a certain size are there, but cannot be seen by human eye. It seems clear industry depends critically on this fact. I may trot out some of these pictures again at some point if the bubble discussion re-emerges. I think it ended up in a chemistry discussion really. The righteous path on bubbles as I see it now is about particle sizes and relative amounts of fluxes vs very refractory materials in the glaze. -
Sorry Nerd, still trying to get my avatar to work after it mysteriously disappeared a couple months ago. This was just a deliberately small resolution version to try ala Marcia Selsors recent suggestion - still does not work! Driving me nuts. Will try to find the larger format version and post, although not even sure if I remember where this shot came from. But as you will probably know it came from a digital microscope...
-
-
From the album: Talc Testing
Looking for talc graying... -
Progressive Talc Additions in Stoneware Clay Body
curt posted a gallery image in Browse Member Galleries
From the album: Talc Testing
Here are five very similar clay bodies fired in both oxidation and reduction at cone 10. Talc is increasing progressively from bottom to top and if you look carefully this seems to be imparting a gray or dark color to the clay in both types of firings. -
nerd test tiles in order of increasing TOTAL contaminants
curt posted a gallery image in Browse Member Galleries
From the album: Talc Testing
this photo rearranges Nerd's test bars according the their total combined level of the contaminants iron, magnesium and titanium, as reported by Nerd. Gaps between bars in the photo indicate a significant jump in the quantity between bars. -
nerd porcelain test tiles grouped by iron content.
curt posted a gallery image in Browse Member Galleries
From the album: Talc Testing
these are talc tests supplied by nerd, grouped by iron levels. The groupings mean that bars in a group have generally similar levels of iron to other bars in that group. -
From the album: Talc Testing
-
nerd magnesium test tiles in order of ascending magnesium
curt posted a gallery image in Browse Member Galleries
From the album: Talc Testing
-
From the album: ian currie test tiles
this is what the whole bat looks like. thick is good so that if you are pressing/rolling a piece of clay down on to the bat it is less likely to snap if the surface it is on is uneven. I think a thicker bat also absorbs more water if you are producing a run of currie tiles at one time rather than just a couple. I tend to make a couple dozen using two or three different clay bodies and then dry and bisque them all in a batch so they are ready to go when I decide to run some tests.