Crooked Lawyer Potter
Members-
Posts
98 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Profile Information
-
Location
Mississippi
Recent Profile Visitors
728 profile views
Crooked Lawyer Potter's Achievements
Advanced Member (3/3)
26
Reputation
-
Callie Yes the kiln is vented. I have always bisqued to cone 06 but changed just recently to 08, just to see if it made a difference in the glaze take-up. I think the current problem appears in both instances -- cone 06 and cone 08 but I am going to make sure by further experiment. Thanks for your input.
-
I need help figuring out this glaze defect. I've gotten these mugs just where I want them except for this issue. The defects do not appear anywhere except in the interior of mugs or glasses. So, for instance, it is never a problem with plates or bowls. I'm thinking it must be related to the different conditions that arise in the tight confines of the mugs interior (higher heat, perhaps?). The mugs are dipped first in an ash glaze, allowed to dry, and then second dipped in David Leach II. The ash glaze is 50% ash, 50% red slip. David Leach II is : potash feldspar 45 dolomite 15 frit 3124 5 EPK 15 Silica 10 Talc 10 colorant (iron ochre, or copper carb, or cobalt carb) The clay is Laguna WC436. Its an oxidation firing in an electric kiln at cone 6 with a slow cool. The bisque was to cone 08. Anyone have any ideas as to what is going on here? (The hole looks to me as if it goes all the way to the clay.)
-
I may have asked this before, but this business of "viscosity v specific gravity v deflocculation" keeps me in a state of confusion. For instance, if I want to "thin" the glaze I could: (1) add water - thereby thinning it and lowering its SG, or (2) deflocculate itthereby thinning it but keeping its SG the same, right? Is there a reason to do one over the other? And, is "thinning" it the same as making it more "viscous"?
-
Listmates I've have some pit-fired cruets that I want to use as olive oil containers. I know that the relatively low firing temp means they are not fully waterproof so I have treated the inside with a stone sealer that is labeled "non-toxic" and "safe for food preparation areas". Any thoughts on whether this is safe for the intended use? And how does one go about getting such a determination? Are there labs that will test it?
-
Hulk reacted to a post in a topic: Specific Gravity Less than 1.0 !?!
-
Specific Gravity Less than 1.0 !?!
Crooked Lawyer Potter replied to Crooked Lawyer Potter's topic in Clay and Glaze Chemistry
-
Specific Gravity Less than 1.0 !?!
Crooked Lawyer Potter replied to Crooked Lawyer Potter's topic in Clay and Glaze Chemistry
I'm a sucker for a system. I did not like having to carefully fill those skinny beakers to the 100 g line and then weigh, rinse out, etc. I had this 80 g syringe in my studio so I weighed it empty and noted the result (28g). Then I prepared a chart in Excel that worked out all the SG numbers between 1.0 and 1.75 and stuck on the studio wall so that all I had to do to test SG was to draw glaze into the syringe to the 50 g mark and then lay it on the scale. I then looked at the chart to see the corresponding SG. Sounds complicated I know but its really simple once done and very handy. It looks like this: Scale says: Less 28g (syringe) X2 =SG 99 71 142 100 72 144 101 73 146 etc all the way from 100 to 175 -
Specific Gravity Less than 1.0 !?!
Crooked Lawyer Potter replied to Crooked Lawyer Potter's topic in Clay and Glaze Chemistry
Got ya