Bill Kielb 2,594 Posted January 12, 2019 Report Share My understanding is bubbles quite often are not buoyant enough to rise through the viscous glaze. To some extent a successful glaze is constrained by the need to not run under the influence of gravity. Is it unreasonable to say glazes with no interior bubbles are likely rare and then by that reasoning at what point should become concerned? Quote Link to comment
glazenerd 1,807 Posted January 12, 2019 Report Share Blisters indicate pressure, especially if they have raised rims. The holes are only 1/32 or so, but 200x makes them look huge. However, it is enough to cause weeping. Bubbles are normal for off gassing spars and can be remedied. Blisters, even if a few typically indicate the body has been compromised. Bubbles can come from a glaze, and sometimes blisters: but blisters more often come from the clay; sulfides and spars. Quote Link to comment
Bill Kielb 2,594 Posted January 12, 2019 Report Share Understood but the text box in the picture seams to imply the surface could heal but the bubbles on the inside are? Maybe ok, maybe not - or is this over thinking? Quote Link to comment
glazenerd 1,807 Posted January 12, 2019 Report Share You have it. Once pores open up within the body: game over. I have looked at many stoneware samples under the scope; seen few that did not have some level of imperfections. Quote Link to comment
liambesaw 3,033 Posted January 14, 2019 Report Share Can you post a picture of the same body that's been fired properly? Quote Link to comment
Recommended Comments
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.