I usually paint underglaze on greenware so that the glaze application does not affect the painting. Occasionally, I paint on bisqueware for logistical reasons, eg the work is too fragile to risk a lot of handling; in these cases, I send the piece back through the bisque with no issues. At least, I DID... until I had a disaster where a large (2' long), thick piece got huge cracks in the second bisque firing. This second bisque was done at a different studio, and I don't know what schedule they used or how it was fired, so I'm not sure if anything strange happened. Needless to say, I am now very wary about double-bisquing very large pieces.
I am currently working a large round tabletop (made with a 1/4" thick, 2' diameter slab, and a 1-1/2" rim and a grid underneath). I bisqued it facedown and am now painting the top with a lot of intricate details. I don't want to risk glazing it without "setting" the underglaze first before I pour or brush the glaze on, but I'm scared! Especially because it will have to be fired right-side-up now due to the underglaze (I've noticed some fluxier colors will stick to the kiln shelf).
What would be the safest way to bisque this again? Options I've considered:
Bisque super low at cone 020 or so. In this case, would it be safer to fire it fast or slow?
A friend swears by a custom schedule that goes extra slow during quartz inversion for double-bisquing risky pieces. Has anyone heard of this?
Bisque it normally. I don't know how the previous work was fired during its fatal second bisque, so maybe the studio fired it in a strange way, or the stress of transporting it damaged it and the issue has nothing to do with re-bisquing.
Thank you so much for your help! And apologies for the long post.