2Relaxed Posted November 23, 2020 Report Share Posted November 23, 2020 This more of a curiosity question. So I fired a bunch of test tiles using a slow-cool schedule. Some of them developed tiny crystals. Question #1: If I refire the same test tiles using a natural-cool schedule, will the crystals be "erased" do you think? Question #2: Would the results coming out of this second fire be the same (or similar enough) to what I would get if I only ever fired these test tiles using a natural-cool schedule? Question #3: This one is about refiring tiles (that were initially fired without slow cooling) using a slow-cool schedule. Would I get crystals the same way I would if I only ever fired these tests using a slow-cool schedule? Is your head spinning yet? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Min Posted November 23, 2020 Report Share Posted November 23, 2020 #1 - Probably but not for 100% positive, would have to test. #2 - It depends on what "similar enough" is. There is already heatwork done to the glaze during the first firing, you would be adding more heatwork during the second so the glaze is going to be more melted. #3 - See #2. You would probably get the crystals back but in a more fluid glaze. If you are re-firing a cone 6 glaze then either putting it in a cool spot of the kiln or only firing to cone 5 usually helps cut back on the amount of glaze running from an overfired glaze. Some glazes just don't like being re-fired, neither do some claybodies, especially the pyroplastic ones. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2Relaxed Posted November 23, 2020 Author Report Share Posted November 23, 2020 @Min Cool, thanks Min! I'll refire some and report back! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldlady Posted November 25, 2020 Report Share Posted November 25, 2020 i refired a fabulous cordovan glaze and the second attempt was blah brown. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.