Callie Beller Diesel

As others have already noted, neither zinc oxide nor chrome oxide used in reasonable amounts in a stable glaze are toxic. A different issue arises when both are used together in the same glaze - ugliness abounds. Chrome is supposed to be green when in a glaze that does not contain tin. A combination with tin in the right amounts creates a variety of pinks and reds. Zinc with chrome, however, turns assorted shades of brown, when copious amounts are used. It won't hurt you, but you probably don't want to look at it. Perhaps your glaze recipe doesn't have enough for the adverse color reactions.

Let's not throw the baby out with the bathwater here. The form of chrome used makes all the difference in the world in regards to toxicity.
Potters use chrome oxide, it is insoluble in water and gets bound in the glaze matrix in a balance glaze. It is volatile in the kiln so it can cause a pink blush on tin white glazes. Wear gloves if you get contact dermatitis with it. (it's a good idea to wear gloves whenever handling raw materials and glaze slurries to avoid skin reactions)
We do not use the exceedingly dangerous hexavalent chromium in ceramics. Iron chromate is toxic, stay away from using it.
Zinc oxide fumes from kiln firing shouldn't be breathed in, zinc can become volatile above around 850C/1560F and like all the materials we use in glazes practice good studio hygiene and wear a respirator while handling dry materials. In a glaze it isn't a problem. 
Chrome + tin pinks and reds are perfectly safe, whether in a stain or from the oxides.
 
 
 

Callie, I guess this was the artist behind the music bowls installation CÉLESTE BOURSIER-MOUGENOT | CLINAMEN https://www.ngv.vic.gov.au/exhibition/celeste-boursier-mougenot/ 

Callie, it took me quite some time to find this video that quite closely resembles what you've mentioned https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ADYkCyQ_aRM If it is, it sure is soothing to the ear. And the calming blues and whites add this meditative aspect to it.
I do think interacting with a piece makes you feel more involved and puts you into this mental space that connects you to the activity, in a way that grounds you to the present moment. If a piece was mechanized in some manner, I guess that would be interesting as well, it could make something inanimate come to life which can be seen as appealing in some ways.

I wish I could remember where this piece was installed, or who made it, but an artist made a whole bunch of thinly trimmed porcelain bowls, and floated them in a pool of water with a gentle current running through it. The bowls rang and sounded like wind chimes when they bumped into each other. It was incredibly soothing. 
My initial inclination for question three is to say that I’d prefer to interact with a piece rather than have a constant sound, but I think that subtle environmental interactions could count towards that. 

Juried exhibitions or invitationals through galleries have never netted me any sales. They can be a nice ego rub, which has its own value, but that value isn’t monetary IME. 
Juried fairs or markets however, are a good thing. Juries can help put together a crowd of compatible artists and quality of work, which helps get it in front of people who are interested in such things. 

I get mine about 10 boxes at a time and stack it outside the studio door. I go through it at a rate that it doesn't have time to dry out. But I also have the luxury of living in the same town where I buy my clay.
 

I prefer to use the term "durable" rather than food safe when talking about glazes. There isn't one agreed upon definition of what makes a glaze "food safe". In North America if a glaze does not contain lead or cadmium it can be labelled food safe. This is a very wide definition and adding something along the lines of what Mayco says "Finishedware producers bear responsibility for food safe testing their ware being sold into commerce." IMHO isn't good enough. Like Callie said Strontium Crystal Magic (SCM) is  fine on the outside of pots where your mouth or food won't be in contact with it.
Re lithium and toxicity, just adding a little bit. Topic of lithium and toxicity has come up in many discussions in many forums etc over the years. My impression of the reading I've done is it might not be an issue for most people but for those on lithium therapy it can be, both in the process of mixing glazes and leaching glazes.  Poison is in the dosage scenario.
With all due respect to Callie I found SCM quite rough, dry and unmelted. You could try it by itself on a test tile and see how you find it but it's a bit of a moot point because it isn't used by itself.  The overload of titanium is what makes the crystals/variegation when layered with other glazes. A good way to get interesting glaze reactions is to layer 2 or more dissimilar glazes, what one glaze lacks or has a surplus of reacts with the other glaze, this often results in interesting visual texture. SCM is loaded with fluxes to react with other glazes, that's part of the reason why it works.
Re silica and glaze durability, having as much silica and alumina in a glaze is one of the ways to ensure a durable glaze.  For cone 6 having at least 2.5 molar of silica is a good starting place, if the glaze can dissolve more then it's a good idea to add it if you are looking for a durable glaze. If you look at the screenshot above in the bottom half of the image you can see the silica is 1.68 so at the bare minimum it is about 1/3 short of where it should be. Overloading a matte glaze can quite often turn it into a gloss glaze  and really oversupplying it can turn it back into a matte and crazed glaze so there are parameters within which to work. 
Another aspect of silica that is often overlooked is the mesh size of the silica being used. When you mix glazes using a 325 mesh size silica more of the silica will likely be dissolved in the glaze than if you use 200 mesh. (not applicable for the SCM)
One more thing is to look at the colouring oxides used. Don't use crazy amounts of colouring/transition oxides, use the least you can to still achieve the effect/colour you are after.
There is a good article on toxicity that includes materials here if it helps.

Toxicity is a whole entire subject by itself. Mostly we have to start with definitions to help clarify. 
Tl;dr, yes you can put this glaze on the outside of a pot and it will be fine. It’s not touching food. It melts fine at cone 6, it’s just a “soft” glaze.
When a raw material is labelled toxic, that means it’s toxic in its current form. Once you put a material into a glaze with other materials and fire it, it becomes another material entirely, with different properties. If you’re using a commericallly mixed glaze that is labelled non-toxic, that means it’s not toxic in the unfired state. (It’s probably not toxic in the fired state either, but you’d have to test it to confirm, and manufacturers can’t say that it is for sure under all circumstances without legal problems. People do weird and unexpected things.)
When we’re talking about glazes, most often the finished glaze is more safe than, say, raw lithium. So potters should be concerned about their own health and safety first, and the end user second. Materials like lithium can be handled safely with sensible studio hygiene practices, and can be beneficial in a lot of good glazes.
When knowledgeable glaze chemists talk about food safety, we aren’t talking about whether a glaze will leach Bad Things (TM) into food. This is a very infrequent scenario outside of lead use, and lead hasn’t been used in most handmade pottery for decades now. But we are thinking about craftsmanship and durability. We’re asking questions like Does this glaze have flaws like crazing or pinholing, that can affect structural integrity or possibly harbour bacteria? Does this glaze scratch, or does it cutlery mark? Does it stain easily? Is it easy to clean? If those problems are solved, leaching is usually a non-issue. 
Re the silica question: You need 3 types of components in the right proportions in a base glaze for durability: silica to form glass, alumina for strength and to make it not run too badly, and different metals that make silica and alumina melt at much lower temperatures than they do by themselves (fluxes). Without enough silica or alumina, or if those things are in the wrong proportions, the glaze may react to acids found in many drinks, bases like in dishwasher detergent, or may scratch or cutlery mark. SCM doesn’t supply enough silica for durability, but the strontium is also a problem.
Within the flux category, there’s a bunch of stuff that’s a good idea to use in combination, because each material has beneficial and undesirable properties, and mixing them can bring out the best (or sometimes worst) of both worlds. For example, sodium is a strong flux, which is needed to bring down the melting temperature of silica and alumina, and is in most glazes. However, it tends to make glazes craze when by itself. But if you mix it with calcium (or barium or strontium or lithium and a few others), you can still get the melting, but less crazing.
The calcium/magnesium/strontium etc group of fluxes also give you different colour responses, or can help create matte effects if the proportions are high enough. One of the drawbacks of using strontium or barium though is that neither is very high on the Moh hardness scale, so if you use too much of it, the resulting glaze can be prone to scratching, staining or other flaws. But it helps create that really cool matte surface because it promotes crystallization, so sometimes creative folks make trade offs. 

Toxicity is a whole entire subject by itself. Mostly we have to start with definitions to help clarify. 
Tl;dr, yes you can put this glaze on the outside of a pot and it will be fine. It’s not touching food. It melts fine at cone 6, it’s just a “soft” glaze.
When a raw material is labelled toxic, that means it’s toxic in its current form. Once you put a material into a glaze with other materials and fire it, it becomes another material entirely, with different properties. If you’re using a commericallly mixed glaze that is labelled non-toxic, that means it’s not toxic in the unfired state. (It’s probably not toxic in the fired state either, but you’d have to test it to confirm, and manufacturers can’t say that it is for sure under all circumstances without legal problems. People do weird and unexpected things.)
When we’re talking about glazes, most often the finished glaze is more safe than, say, raw lithium. So potters should be concerned about their own health and safety first, and the end user second. Materials like lithium can be handled safely with sensible studio hygiene practices, and can be beneficial in a lot of good glazes.
When knowledgeable glaze chemists talk about food safety, we aren’t talking about whether a glaze will leach Bad Things (TM) into food. This is a very infrequent scenario outside of lead use, and lead hasn’t been used in most handmade pottery for decades now. But we are thinking about craftsmanship and durability. We’re asking questions like Does this glaze have flaws like crazing or pinholing, that can affect structural integrity or possibly harbour bacteria? Does this glaze scratch, or does it cutlery mark? Does it stain easily? Is it easy to clean? If those problems are solved, leaching is usually a non-issue. 
Re the silica question: You need 3 types of components in the right proportions in a base glaze for durability: silica to form glass, alumina for strength and to make it not run too badly, and different metals that make silica and alumina melt at much lower temperatures than they do by themselves (fluxes). Without enough silica or alumina, or if those things are in the wrong proportions, the glaze may react to acids found in many drinks, bases like in dishwasher detergent, or may scratch or cutlery mark. SCM doesn’t supply enough silica for durability, but the strontium is also a problem.
Within the flux category, there’s a bunch of stuff that’s a good idea to use in combination, because each material has beneficial and undesirable properties, and mixing them can bring out the best (or sometimes worst) of both worlds. For example, sodium is a strong flux, which is needed to bring down the melting temperature of silica and alumina, and is in most glazes. However, it tends to make glazes craze when by itself. But if you mix it with calcium (or barium or strontium or lithium and a few others), you can still get the melting, but less crazing.
The calcium/magnesium/strontium etc group of fluxes also give you different colour responses, or can help create matte effects if the proportions are high enough. One of the drawbacks of using strontium or barium though is that neither is very high on the Moh hardness scale, so if you use too much of it, the resulting glaze can be prone to scratching, staining or other flaws. But it helps create that really cool matte surface because it promotes crystallization, so sometimes creative folks make trade offs. 

I wish I could remember where this piece was installed, or who made it, but an artist made a whole bunch of thinly trimmed porcelain bowls, and floated them in a pool of water with a gentle current running through it. The bowls rang and sounded like wind chimes when they bumped into each other. It was incredibly soothing. 
My initial inclination for question three is to say that I’d prefer to interact with a piece rather than have a constant sound, but I think that subtle environmental interactions could count towards that. 

It’s worth noting that Etsy selling has never been a way for most users to make a full time living, but many do use it as a supplement or as one of many income streams. Also, don’t follow their advice on pricing your work. Because of how they structure their fees, you’ll have to start with your base price and add all the assorted percentages they charge. Use caution when using their forum for advice on running a business there. Many of the seller communities labour under the (incorrect) assumption that high prices will drive away customers, and that you have to have frequent sales and discounts. None of that is true. Cheap prices draw in deal hunters who will not treat you well. 

Juried exhibitions or invitationals through galleries have never netted me any sales. They can be a nice ego rub, which has its own value, but that value isn’t monetary IME. 
Juried fairs or markets however, are a good thing. Juries can help put together a crowd of compatible artists and quality of work, which helps get it in front of people who are interested in such things. 

I wish I could remember where this piece was installed, or who made it, but an artist made a whole bunch of thinly trimmed porcelain bowls, and floated them in a pool of water with a gentle current running through it. The bowls rang and sounded like wind chimes when they bumped into each other. It was incredibly soothing. 
My initial inclination for question three is to say that I’d prefer to interact with a piece rather than have a constant sound, but I think that subtle environmental interactions could count towards that. 

Toxicity is a whole entire subject by itself. Mostly we have to start with definitions to help clarify. 
Tl;dr, yes you can put this glaze on the outside of a pot and it will be fine. It’s not touching food. It melts fine at cone 6, it’s just a “soft” glaze.
When a raw material is labelled toxic, that means it’s toxic in its current form. Once you put a material into a glaze with other materials and fire it, it becomes another material entirely, with different properties. If you’re using a commericallly mixed glaze that is labelled non-toxic, that means it’s not toxic in the unfired state. (It’s probably not toxic in the fired state either, but you’d have to test it to confirm, and manufacturers can’t say that it is for sure under all circumstances without legal problems. People do weird and unexpected things.)
When we’re talking about glazes, most often the finished glaze is more safe than, say, raw lithium. So potters should be concerned about their own health and safety first, and the end user second. Materials like lithium can be handled safely with sensible studio hygiene practices, and can be beneficial in a lot of good glazes.
When knowledgeable glaze chemists talk about food safety, we aren’t talking about whether a glaze will leach Bad Things (TM) into food. This is a very infrequent scenario outside of lead use, and lead hasn’t been used in most handmade pottery for decades now. But we are thinking about craftsmanship and durability. We’re asking questions like Does this glaze have flaws like crazing or pinholing, that can affect structural integrity or possibly harbour bacteria? Does this glaze scratch, or does it cutlery mark? Does it stain easily? Is it easy to clean? If those problems are solved, leaching is usually a non-issue. 
Re the silica question: You need 3 types of components in the right proportions in a base glaze for durability: silica to form glass, alumina for strength and to make it not run too badly, and different metals that make silica and alumina melt at much lower temperatures than they do by themselves (fluxes). Without enough silica or alumina, or if those things are in the wrong proportions, the glaze may react to acids found in many drinks, bases like in dishwasher detergent, or may scratch or cutlery mark. SCM doesn’t supply enough silica for durability, but the strontium is also a problem.
Within the flux category, there’s a bunch of stuff that’s a good idea to use in combination, because each material has beneficial and undesirable properties, and mixing them can bring out the best (or sometimes worst) of both worlds. For example, sodium is a strong flux, which is needed to bring down the melting temperature of silica and alumina, and is in most glazes. However, it tends to make glazes craze when by itself. But if you mix it with calcium (or barium or strontium or lithium and a few others), you can still get the melting, but less crazing.
The calcium/magnesium/strontium etc group of fluxes also give you different colour responses, or can help create matte effects if the proportions are high enough. One of the drawbacks of using strontium or barium though is that neither is very high on the Moh hardness scale, so if you use too much of it, the resulting glaze can be prone to scratching, staining or other flaws. But it helps create that really cool matte surface because it promotes crystallization, so sometimes creative folks make trade offs. 

I wish I could remember where this piece was installed, or who made it, but an artist made a whole bunch of thinly trimmed porcelain bowls, and floated them in a pool of water with a gentle current running through it. The bowls rang and sounded like wind chimes when they bumped into each other. It was incredibly soothing. 
My initial inclination for question three is to say that I’d prefer to interact with a piece rather than have a constant sound, but I think that subtle environmental interactions could count towards that. 

Juried exhibitions or invitationals through galleries have never netted me any sales. They can be a nice ego rub, which has its own value, but that value isn’t monetary IME. 
Juried fairs or markets however, are a good thing. Juries can help put together a crowd of compatible artists and quality of work, which helps get it in front of people who are interested in such things. 

There are several potters who show their seams on mugs and bowls. I can't think of names off of the top of my head, but I follow a few on Instagram. Saying that you copied the seam is like saying that you copied the shape of a mug. 
Betty

Copying a design versus using the same technique while making a pot are two different things. Are there any new designs in functional ware that haven't been done before by someone somewhere, I don't know but I sort of doubt it.
I have noticed quite a few makers doing exactly what you describe; leaving the mark of the making process visible at the joins. I don't think you need to waste your energy trying to justify your work. Getting inspiration from others work is one way to challenge yourself into making new forms, and making them your own.  I'm sorry you are going through this, it must have been upsetting to you.

No worries on firing when it's 40F outside.
If the glaze crazes when you remove pots from the kiln it won't be because of the temperature being a little cold. It will be because the glaze is too small for the clay. Simple way to think of this is to think of a pair of jeans and how they fit. If I wear a size 10 and my daughter wears a size 4 if I put her jeans on the seams will split. If she puts my jeans on they will bag out and fall off. Tight splitting jeans is like a crazing glaze, loose falling off jeans is like shivering glaze. Crazing is far far more common than shivering. 

I think that since so many of us fire to midrange the go to mindset is bisque low, fire higher to glaze. Problem with this when working with earthenware is more often than not the commercial glazes are rated in the 06-04 range yet many earthenware bodies will actually mature higher than this and still be porous enough to take glaze well. I haven't used the body in question, but if it can go to 02 (as the lit suggests) then I would at least try 03 and see how it does. 

Just heard this -The owner of Kemper Tools has sold the business. New owner has to move the factory as the property has sold as well. Not sure if this will stay  as a domestic business and what will be made  in terms of the tool line. They made so many I would not be surprized that that line is trimmed down . Pricing may change as well.. It's funny as I noticed Bailey has a sale going on Kemper now which is odd. My guess is there will be a time period that these tools will not be in production as well. The good news is Kemper will be around in some sense in the future. 

@Katie S I have become quite adamant about "what clay is it?"  Name, rank, serial number, when firing for others.  If they do not know, I politely decline.  A friend of mine just had a horrible kiln accident with that very thing.  Melted cups and plates all over the shelves.  Yes, they were low fire.  Fired to mid fire.  The person making the request didn't do their work.  You would probably be fine with 04,  probably.  But.....

Chiming in a little late on this one, but you mentioned the crack in your piece happening at another studio, where the bisque cycle is unknown to you. I strongly suspect the cause wasn’t the fact that it was bisqued twice, more that the cycle used was likely not suitable for your piece. Two foot pieces are going to need a slower cycle than regular pieces, just due to sheer thermal mass.  If the studio’s usual bisque cycle didn’t take that into account, or the kiln pack wasn’t a particularly heavy or even, that would be the most likely explanation to me.
Side note: I just spent the morning going through Ceramic Materials Workshop’s new commercial clay body analysis resource. It’s free if anyone wants to check it out for themselves. So far the submissions are limited to assorted clays in the US that are in the roughly cone 6-10 range. Bill’s statement that clays will shrink upon a second bisque depend greatly on what the first bisque temperature was, and which clay body is in question. If you’re bisquing to a common 06 temperature, the statement of a less than 1% increase is likely enough. If your usual bisque is higher or lower, it might not be. After about 1000*C (roughly cone 04) many clay bodies hold steady for a time before continuing to shrink. If you bisque very low to cone 020, the shrinkage charts actually decrease for a time, meaning the piece expands a bit after the carbonates and chemical water burn off. 
Again, this is VERY clay body dependent. 
 
 
 

Now, to give you a sense of what 'curio' scale means here is the same bisque shown in my hand.  Here I have airbrushed on underglaze in greys and black and I am now dappling him.  Once fired with a clear glaze over this underglaze, he will be a dappled grey!  This is a sales piece that I will be offering at auction probably next weekend while I'm at a live show event.  But for now there's a lot of work to do to him to get him ready to be the new sample of my sculpture in ceramic!  I'll post more photos as I go so you all can see the finished boy when he's done.  I work in many layers, fire a number of times, and will also work in over glazes.  The upright mane ribbons will be added later after he's completed and are going to be enameled metal but I haven't finished making them yet.  They each fit down into little  holes I have drilled down his neck.
I am also making mold pieces for a larger 'traditional' scale version of this boy that stands about 8 inches tall.  I hope to have that one casting by June in time for a huge international event I'm attending in July at the Kentucky Horse Park in Lexington, KY.