Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Claypple

Two different worlds out there.

Recommended Posts

Claypple    29

I keep thinking of an article in Ceramic Monthly of March 2013 written about Scott Cooper.

He had a dream of being a full-time potter and finally fulfilled it. Unfortunately, the things didn't go as planned, the income was unsteady,

and 18 months later he made the choice to reverse his dream and return back to his previous occupation.

 

This is what he writes about life after he killed his dream:

"Life without it isn't so bad; in fact, it's pretty good. I only get to spend half my working life in the studio, but that time is much freer to do what I want.

I get to make the pots I really want to make, in the ways I want to make them. I can slow down when I need to, and can take more chances while worrying less about their outcome."

 

I think there ARE two different words out there: the professional potters and people who just do it because they cannot live without it.

Which world do you belong to?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Pres    896

I keep thinking of an article in Ceramic Monthly of March 2013 written about Scott Cooper.

He had a dream of being a full-time potter and finally fulfilled it. Unfortunately, the things didn't go as planned, the income was unsteady,

and 18 months later he made the choice to reverse his dream and return back to his previous occupation.

 

This is what he writes about life after he killed his dream:

"Life without it isn't so bad; in fact, it's pretty good. I only get to spend half my working life in the studio, but that time is much freer to do what I want.

I get to make the pots I really want to make, in the ways I want to make them. I can slow down when I need to, and can take more chances while worrying less about their outcome."

 

I think there ARE two different words out there: the professional potters and people who just do it because they cannot live without it.

Which world do you belong to?

 

 

I think there could be three worlds out there, the two you mentioned, and then the person that has retired. When retired, if your retirement funds are sufficient, then you can make what you want for the love of doing it. If you happen to sell then so be it. You don't have to have $10,000 worth of stock to do a show in 3 months and only have the evening hours and weekends to do it. Retired is another world and I happen to live in that one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
OffCenter    82

I keep thinking of an article in Ceramic Monthly of March 2013 written about Scott Cooper.

He had a dream of being a full-time potter and finally fulfilled it. Unfortunately, the things didn't go as planned, the income was unsteady,

and 18 months later he made the choice to reverse his dream and return back to his previous occupation.

 

This is what he writes about life after he killed his dream:

"Life without it isn't so bad; in fact, it's pretty good. I only get to spend half my working life in the studio, but that time is much freer to do what I want.

I get to make the pots I really want to make, in the ways I want to make them. I can slow down when I need to, and can take more chances while worrying less about their outcome."

 

I think there ARE two different words out there: the professional potters and people who just do it because they cannot live without it.

Which world do you belong to?

 

 

I think there are two main kinds of potters: Production and Art. (I don't consider hobby potters to be potters so, I'm completely leaving out people who've taken a couple of pottery classes and now inflict their bunny rabbit mugs on relatives as Christmas and ask on this forum what temperatures the little dots on the kiln dials represent or spend 1000 hours carving grapes and fairies on already hideous vases so their son can declare here that it is the world's greatest pottery.) As I've said here before, I don't see the difference between pure production pottery and working in a factory except that in the factory you get more time off and better benefits. It may sound a bit pretentious to call the other main class of potter an Art Potter but that's what I'm calling it because that potter approaches his/her studio the same way a painter or sculptor approaches his/hers. Not at all interested in producing dishes or bragging about having gone through a ton of clay, they go to the studio to express themselves in clay.

 

How you pay for that time in the studio doesn't matter. Some use their retirement savings and benefits, others have a spouse who provides most of the income, many teach, and some of us do some production pottery to support our REAL pottery.

 

Jim

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Marcia Selsor    1,301

I'd have to say I agree with Jim to a certain extent. I know many Art Potters from around the world who make amazing pieces that are very time consuming and who exhibit is very high end galleries.But they often have to work at something in addition to creating Art. Full time professional potters work really hard to support themselves and their families. There are also those who are lucky to have additional income from a spouse.

There are also those who teach an create.

I am retired after decades of teaching and making pottery. It is wonderful to have the time to be able to go to my studio and make whatever I want without the necessity of the $10,000 stock for a show.

 

Marcia

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Claypple    29

Offcenter, that is unfair to bring the question of art/no art to this topic.

First of all, we already know that what is an art for one person is not an art for another.

Secondly, not every well designed/well made bowl, vase,etc has to be a piece of art.

 

This article was not about the products at all. It is mainly about the choices we make:

What is more suitable for each of us: to get involved in the pottery 100% and become a professional or

to do it at a leisure time.

 

I, personally, love it that I do not have to rush when I am at the wheel, and I do not have to make the same vessel (bowl, mug, etc)

again and again and again. I like it that I can contemplate for hours before I touch the clay body. I like it that sometimes I have unpredictable result.

I don't think I regret that I've never gone to the art school to become an artist. And I do not really care at this point whether what I make is an art or not.

I just enjoy the fact that I can express myself in something I like.

 

If I were I professional potter, I would have to be concerned about ..... well, not for me to say. Some of us (some of you) know better.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
GEP    863

I keep thinking of an article in Ceramic Monthly of March 2013 written about Scott Cooper.

He had a dream of being a full-time potter and finally fulfilled it. Unfortunately, the things didn't go as planned, the income was unsteady,

and 18 months later he made the choice to reverse his dream and return back to his previous occupation.

 

This is what he writes about life after he killed his dream:

"Life without it isn't so bad; in fact, it's pretty good. I only get to spend half my working life in the studio, but that time is much freer to do what I want.

I get to make the pots I really want to make, in the ways I want to make them. I can slow down when I need to, and can take more chances while worrying less about their outcome."

 

I think there ARE two different words out there: the professional potters and people who just do it because they cannot live without it.

Which world do you belong to?

 

 

Both. But I identify more with the latter. I had another full-time occupation for many years, spending all my free time with pottery. I was able to develop my work my own way, without any financial pressure. In hindsight, this was incredibly valuable. A luxury. I've met plenty of artists who don't have that freedom. In recent years my pottery business has been providing me with a livable income. So now I am in that world too. I am grateful for every day that I get to do this. I dreamed about it for many years, but now (again with hindsight) I would be just fine to still work another job. I've met many artists on the art festival circuit who do this. It's still a good life. So if my pottery stops providing a good income (or if I stop enjoying it as much), no problem I will get another job. It doesn't matter. I think this is one reason why my business works, because I'm not just trying to "make a buck."

 

I hope we don't divide into an us against them mentality, where professionals and non-professionals think they are superior, just because they don't understand each other. Potters are potters.

 

Mea

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Claypple    29

I hope we don't divide into an us against them mentality, where professionals and non-professionals think they are superior, just because they don't understand each other. Potters are potters.

 

Mea

 

 

Well, I kind of assumed that the professionals are WAY better than the hobbyists in the knowledge they have, products they made.

That is why they are so good and generous in answering our stupid questions.

I was not asking who is the better than others. I was asking of "what choices do we make and why?"

 

E.g., if I were a professional potter, I would have more time to work in the studio, and I would progress much faster than i am doing now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Chris Campbell    1,082

I often speak to students/new potters on the business aspects of pottery and it is interesting to note that even at this point they break down into two categories by the simple virtue of a question. One group asks ... "Can I make a living making my pottery?" ... and the other asks "How can I make a living from my pottery?"

Their odds of success are at the root of these questions and their eventual success has less to do with what they make than what they are willing to do to succeed. There is no automatic success button for the full time, or artistic or extremely talented. But you can make a living, you can build a good life by doing whatever you need to do, not letting others judge your efforts or point out your failures or try to box you into their categories.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
OffCenter    82

Offcenter, that is unfair to bring the question of art/no art to this topic.

 

 

 

No it isn't. It is a a direct reply to your post that is on topic. If you want to limit replies to your "I think there ARE two different words out there: the professional potters and people who just do it because they cannot live without it." then my response is that, that statement strikes me as naive.

 

Jim

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
GEP    863

I hope we don't divide into an us against them mentality, where professionals and non-professionals think they are superior, just because they don't understand each other. Potters are potters.

 

Mea

 

 

Well, I kind of assumed that the professionals are WAY better than the hobbyists in the knowledge they have, products they made.

That is why they are so good and generous in answering our stupid questions.

I was not asking who is the better than others. I was asking of "what choices do we make and why?"

 

E.g., if I were a professional potter, I would have more time to work in the studio, and I would progress much faster than i am doing now.

 

 

The point when I began progressing in terms of skill level was not when I decided to try selling, it was when I left the community center studio and made my own studio at home. Not only did I have daily access to it, but just having your own space, to spread out, make a mess, think for yourself, etc., makes a huge difference. This was long before I ever considered making a living at it. Selling was a side-thought, meant only to address the "what do I do with all these pots?" question. After a while, I was coming home from art festivals with a decent paycheck in my pocket. And so on. This took me eight years of slow and steady progress before I quit my other job.

 

Mea

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
jrgpots    231

I keep thinking of an article in Ceramic Monthly of March 2013 written about Scott Cooper.

He had a dream of being a full-time potter and finally fulfilled it. Unfortunately, the things didn't go as planned, the income was unsteady,

and 18 months later he made the choice to reverse his dream and return back to his previous occupation.

 

This is what he writes about life after he killed his dream:

"Life without it isn't so bad; in fact, it's pretty good. I only get to spend half my working life in the studio, but that time is much freer to do what I want.

I get to make the pots I really want to make, in the ways I want to make them. I can slow down when I need to, and can take more chances while worrying less about their outcome."

 

I think there ARE two different words out there: the professional potters and people who just do it because they cannot live without it.

Which world do you belong to?

 

 

I think there are two main kinds of potters: Production and Art. (I don't consider hobby potters to be potters so, I'm completely leaving out people who've taken a couple of pottery classes and now inflict their bunny rabbit mugs on relatives as Christmas and ask on this forum what temperatures the little dots on the kiln dials represent or spend 1000 hours carving grapes and fairies on already hideous vases so their son can declare here that it is the world's greatest pottery.) As I've said here before, I don't see the difference between pure production pottery and working in a factory except that in the factory you get more time off and better benefits. It may sound a bit pretentious to call the other main class of potter an Art Potter but that's what I'm calling it because that potter approaches his/her studio the same way a painter or sculptor approaches his/hers. Not at all interested in producing dishes or bragging about having gone through a ton of clay, they go to the studio to express themselves in clay.

 

How you pay for that time in the studio doesn't matter. Some use their retirement savings and benefits, others have a spouse who provides most of the income, many teach, and some of us do some production pottery to support our REAL pottery.

 

Jim

 

 

 

I am new member and still struggle with the knobs. I struggle to center, and I ask silly questions. I am a hobbyist when it comes to pottery. I enjoy listening to all the different personalities on this forum. Many are very kind to the newbies. Jim, you have commented on a couple of my posts. I greatly appreciate your honesty and I smile as you make referrences to other threads within the forum.

 

I am a physician when it comes to profession. Yet I can understand in part where you might be coming from. I started off my practice in a group setting not worrying much about accounts receivable, then "went solo" for a few years. I understand the difference between "How many patients do I have to see to make a business?" and "How can I help the people I see?" Private business pressures are intense and can easily drive the pleasure from the job whether that job is fixing people, creating art, or making pots and mugs. After a few years in solo practice I closed my doors and went to Texas A&M University to teach medicine for about 10 years. Now I am employed as an InstaCare doctor by a large hospital system by Zion National Park where I plan to retire.

 

With this being said, I'm hooked on pottery and use it as my escape. A friend once told me that if you work in what you like, you'll always like your work. I have found that if you work at what you love, you run the risk of losing that "love" in the day to day activity of work. As i read your posts, I see the excitement, the love, the passion for what you do.

 

Thank you... You help me see I'm not that different than others in an entirely unrelated field who wonder about..... "Two differnt worlds out there."

 

Jed

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Bob in SF    0

Greetings to all - this is my first post - thought provoking article about Scott Cooper, and equally thought provoking thread.

And I appreciate Dr. Jed's post.

As a self-employed academically inclined solo practice (hand) surgeon with 20 years of ongoing self-employment and 30+ years of teaching young surgeons, I also have "legs" firmly planted in art and music and enjoy all 3.

I see a pendulum in constant swing between artistic uniqueness and scientific reproducibility - commercial pleasures and frustrations at both poles and plenty of territory in between them.

Maybe I'm too old to compartmentalize very well, but I see all reimbursed and unreimbursed arts and crafts and sciences as creative rehearsal spaces that inform each other and keep the pendulum in swing.

Warm regards to all members - glad to have found this forum.

 

- Bob

(cracked my Eb clarinet bell, threw another just in time for the gig - urgently necessary functional pottery):

PorcelainEbClarinetBellHandthrownMarkison2013signed1000px.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
trina    20

Greetings to all - this is my first post - thought provoking article about Scott Cooper, and equally thought provoking thread.

And I appreciate Dr. Jed's post.

As a self-employed academically inclined solo practice (hand) surgeon with 20 years of ongoing self-employment and 30+ years of teaching young surgeons, I also have "legs" firmly planted in art and music and enjoy all 3.

I see a pendulum in constant swing between artistic uniqueness and scientific reproducibility - commercial pleasures and frustrations at both poles and plenty of territory in between them.

Maybe I'm too old to compartmentalize very well, but I see all reimbursed and unreimbursed arts and crafts and sciences as creative rehearsal spaces that inform each other and keep the pendulum in swing.

Warm regards to all members - glad to have found this forum.

 

- Bob

(cracked my Eb clarinet bell, threw another just in time for the gig - urgently necessary functional pottery):

PorcelainEbClarinetBellHandthrownMarkison2013signed1000px.jpg

 

 

urgently necessary functional pottery... I love the sound of that! T

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Mark C.    1,797

I think there are more than just two kinds of potters

 

I come from the professional side as far as your definition.

 

I do always have more than 10k too in stock at any giventime

 

I did not start with a plan it’s just happened

 

If you want to make a good living in the functional ceramic world that’s what it takes. I read that article in CM and for me it seemed he did not have what its takes drive wise to me. I never had a choice clay just took over my life without much thought.

 

I agree with Jim on the art side as well as that what’s the most fun for me but its takes production to support that free time art work like salt or wood fired wares for fun.

 

My circle of potter friends is all making a living at this without wife’s job (some are couples working together as potters) or trust funds. It takes 150% effort and also lots of years to perfect. It’s not for most and it’s harder than you think.

 

For me its still fun working in the studio every day. I have many other interests as well and pursue them with equal enthusiasm.

 

I do not pay attention to how many hours I work or how manypots get done as long as the the clay flows and gets fired every week that’s al lthat matters. You need to have markets established and this takes time. If you consider clay Work that I suggest another profession-maybe medicine as its faster to get started-only 10 or so years to get the practice and another 5-10 to get out of debt.

 

I will not retire only slow done as clay is important to me and I want to have a hand in it till the end. I will not do be able to drive it to distant states as I do now forever but will keep my local markets going as I slow down. I have cut 6 shows out now in the past few years. Its best to have a diversified income stream-wholesale,retail and maybe some consignment.This has worked well for me.

 

Mark Cortright

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
OffCenter    82

I keep thinking of an article in Ceramic Monthly of March 2013 written about Scott Cooper.

He had a dream of being a full-time potter and finally fulfilled it. Unfortunately, the things didn't go as planned, the income was unsteady,

and 18 months later he made the choice to reverse his dream and return back to his previous occupation.

 

This is what he writes about life after he killed his dream:

"Life without it isn't so bad; in fact, it's pretty good. I only get to spend half my working life in the studio, but that time is much freer to do what I want.

I get to make the pots I really want to make, in the ways I want to make them. I can slow down when I need to, and can take more chances while worrying less about their outcome."

 

I think there ARE two different words out there: the professional potters and people who just do it because they cannot live without it.

Which world do you belong to?

 

 

I think there are two main kinds of potters: Production and Art. (I don't consider hobby potters to be potters so, I'm completely leaving out people who've taken a couple of pottery classes and now inflict their bunny rabbit mugs on relatives as Christmas and ask on this forum what temperatures the little dots on the kiln dials represent or spend 1000 hours carving grapes and fairies on already hideous vases so their son can declare here that it is the world's greatest pottery.) As I've said here before, I don't see the difference between pure production pottery and working in a factory except that in the factory you get more time off and better benefits. It may sound a bit pretentious to call the other main class of potter an Art Potter but that's what I'm calling it because that potter approaches his/her studio the same way a painter or sculptor approaches his/hers. Not at all interested in producing dishes or bragging about having gone through a ton of clay, they go to the studio to express themselves in clay.

 

How you pay for that time in the studio doesn't matter. Some use their retirement savings and benefits, others have a spouse who provides most of the income, many teach, and some of us do some production pottery to support our REAL pottery.

 

Jim

 

 

 

I am new member and still struggle with the knobs. I struggle to center, and I ask silly questions. I am a hobbyist when it comes to pottery. I enjoy listening to all the different personalities on this forum. Many are very kind to the newbies. Jim, you have commented on a couple of my posts. I greatly appreciate your honesty and I smile as you make referrences to other threads within the forum.

 

I am a physician when it comes to profession. Yet I can understand in part where you might be coming from. I started off my practice in a group setting not worrying much about accounts receivable, then "went solo" for a few years. I understand the difference between "How many patients do I have to see to make a business?" and "How can I help the people I see?" Private business pressures are intense and can easily drive the pleasure from the job whether that job is fixing people, creating art, or making pots and mugs. After a few years in solo practice I closed my doors and went to Texas A&M University to teach medicine for about 10 years. Now I am employed as an InstaCare doctor by a large hospital system by Zion National Park where I plan to retire.

 

With this being said, I'm hooked on pottery and use it as my escape. A friend once told me that if you work in what you like, you'll always like your work. I have found that if you work at what you love, you run the risk of losing that "love" in the day to day activity of work. As i read your posts, I see the excitement, the love, the passion for what you do.

 

Thank you... You help me see I'm not that different than others in an entirely unrelated field who wonder about..... "Two differnt worlds out there."

 

Jed

 

 

Jed, thanks for the insightful post. By hobbyist I mean someone not serious about the art of pottery. Being a beginner doesn't make anyone a hobbyist. I especially like "I have found that if you work at what you love, you run the risk of losing that "love" in the day to day activity of work." I've really never thought of it like that but you're absolutely right. BTW, lucky you, retiring at Zion National Park. I never got there when I used to live out west and traveled there a lot, but always wanted to go to Zion to see the fossils. Wasn't it you in another thread mentioning a constant wind of some sort?

 

Jim

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
OffCenter    82

Greetings to all - this is my first post - thought provoking article about Scott Cooper, and equally thought provoking thread.

And I appreciate Dr. Jed's post.

As a self-employed academically inclined solo practice (hand) surgeon with 20 years of ongoing self-employment and 30+ years of teaching young surgeons, I also have "legs" firmly planted in art and music and enjoy all 3.

I see a pendulum in constant swing between artistic uniqueness and scientific reproducibility - commercial pleasures and frustrations at both poles and plenty of territory in between them.

Maybe I'm too old to compartmentalize very well, but I see all reimbursed and unreimbursed arts and crafts and sciences as creative rehearsal spaces that inform each other and keep the pendulum in swing.

Warm regards to all members - glad to have found this forum.

 

- Bob

(cracked my Eb clarinet bell, threw another just in time for the gig - urgently necessary functional pottery):

PorcelainEbClarinetBellHandthrownMarkison2013signed1000px.jpg

 

Wow! That's some nice "urgently necessary functional pottery"!

 

Jim

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Benzine    609

" or spend 1000 hours carving grapes and fairies on already hideous vases so their son can declare here that it is the world's greatest pottery."

 

 

That thread, really rubbed you the wrong way, didn't it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
OffCenter    82

" or spend 1000 hours carving grapes and fairies on already hideous vases so their son can declare here that it is the world's greatest pottery."

 

 

That thread, really rubbed you the wrong way, didn't it?

 

 

You picked up on that, did you?

 

Jim

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Claypple    29

I think there are two main kinds of potters: Production and Art. (I don't consider hobby potters to be potters. I'm completely leaving out people who've taken a couple of pottery classes and now inflict their bunny rabbit mugs on relatives as Christmas and ask on this forum what temperatures the little dots on the kiln dials represent)

I don't see the difference between pure production pottery and working in a factory.

 

 

Jim

 

 

So what is the "Art"? Who are the judges? We were criticizing the bowels with grapes and fairies (and I didn't like them at all either!!),

but there were a couple of members who were saying "Ah, it is beautiful!". Besides, the couple of people presumably even bought them in the past.

So, are we superior to those people who liked them?

 

What about the production potters who have their own style? Or production potters who are making beautiful things, even though they are just teapots and plates you can use every day?

 

Would you say that a vessel that looks different from anything else created before is art, but something that looks conventional is not?

 

 

I am not arguing with you, but it is not clear for me how you can separate art from non-art.

In fact, I even gonna give you a reason to laugh at me: this is what I thought was an art when I made it at first.

It was my very very first vase that I ever made, so I still like it. For me, it has a character.

Well, I am not sure you consider me a potter, though. :-)

..... So, what IS the ART? post-19169-136810683125_thumb.jpg

 

 

post-19169-136810683125_thumb.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Biglou13    202

Arts like beauty is in the eye if the beholder.

 

This returns to,the whole Jackson pollock discussion.?!?!

 

But asking the question" is it art?" Is like asking what Is the secret to life.

 

I don't think there is a definitive answer.

 

I claim no sense of elitism in having opinions on people's work. But as a creative person/ potter/ artist/ craftsman....... You better have thick skin because some one is always going to,have an opinion/criticism of work. An educated eye is just that an educated eye.

 

Lets look at tea bowls for example. I have a few absolutely horrible ones now living in sculpture garden (thrown in back yard). And then there are tea bowls that sell for thousands of dollars.

 

Sure the $1000 bowl is technically, and more aesthetically pleasing but at what point does it. Crossover into art????

 

There isin't a definitive answer, however I find a clue pointing towards the answer ...... Some one paid thousands of dollars for said item......

 

Back to,original topic. I really don want to be classified can't I just play with mud.........

 

I'm with. Doc. Carefull making hobbies into work. It can suck the joy and passion right out of it.

 

But if I had to choose art and production. I'd choose art.

 

 

Ps . Keep,the drama coming........

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
OffCenter    82

I think there are two main kinds of potters: Production and Art. (I don't consider hobby potters to be potters. I'm completely leaving out people who've taken a couple of pottery classes and now inflict their bunny rabbit mugs on relatives as Christmas and ask on this forum what temperatures the little dots on the kiln dials represent)

I don't see the difference between pure production pottery and working in a factory.

 

 

Jim

 

 

So what is the "Art"? Who are the judges? We were criticizing the bowels with grapes and fairies (and I didn't like them at all either!!),

but there were a couple of members who were saying "Ah, it is beautiful!". Besides, the couple of people presumably even bought them in the past.

So, are we superior to those people who liked them?

 

What about the production potters who have their own style? Or production potters who are making beautiful things, even though they are just teapots and plates you can use every day?

 

Would you say that a vessel that looks different from anything else created before is art, but something that looks conventional is not?

 

 

I am not arguing with you, but it is not clear for me how you can separate art from non-art.

In fact, I even gonna give you a reason to laugh at me: this is what I thought was an art when I made it at first.

It was my very very first vase that I ever made, so I still like it. For me, it has a character.

Well, I am not sure you consider me a potter, though. :-)

..... So, what IS the ART?

 

post-19169-136807548727_thumb.jpg

 

 

I'd never laugh you. You're a treasure for posting things like this instead of When I'm bisque firing should I leave the lid to the kiln all the way open or just half-way? I can only see the thumbnail of the pic because when I click on it it tells me I'm not allowed.... Yes, yes, yes, one person's Art is another person's belly-laugh and no there's no Ultimate Arbitrator so when one of the nuns suggest that Matisse's "Stations of the Cross" in the Rosary Chapel (that he considered his masterpiece) should be whitewashed over she is considered an idiot because Henri Matisse is a great artist so it must be good.http://www.bridgemanart.com/asset/309533/Matisse-Henri-1869-1954/Stations-of-the-Cross-1948-51-ceramic-tile My point being that yes, of course, aesthetic value is subjective and the world of art is largely one big con job but we still have to try..... I assume whatever you posted a picture of is an early work that you were happy with then and now that you've grown, you look back and say what a piece of ######. That's good. That's what I work for. I absolutely love it when I have a pot that I think is great and then come into my studio (chase the snakes away) and look at it with fresh eyes and say "What a piece of ######!" and toss it.... So, I guess my main point is that we shouldn't be afraid to judge just because we may come off as pretentious or un-PC or impolite or whatever because if you don't then we have some ###### coming here showing pictures of godawful vases with poorly carved fairies and grapes and declaring it the greatest pottery any of us has seen and people here so afraid of offending someone that they shamefully and sheepishly say, "Nice work."

 

Jim

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
OffCenter    82

Arts like beauty is in the eye if the beholder.

 

This returns to,the whole Jackson pollock discussion.?!?!

 

But asking the question" is it art?" Is like asking what Is the secret to life.

 

I don't think there is a definitive answer.

 

I claim no sense of elitism in having opinions on people's work. But as a creative person/ potter/ artist/ craftsman....... You better have thick skin because some one is always going to,have an opinion/criticism of work. An educated eye is just that an educated eye.

 

Lets look at tea bowls for example. I have a few absolutely horrible ones now living in sculpture garden (thrown in back yard). And then there are tea bowls that sell for thousands of dollars.

 

Sure the $1000 bowl is technically, and more aesthetically pleasing but at what point does it. Crossover into art????

 

There isin't a definitive answer, however I find a clue pointing towards the answer ...... Some one paid thousands of dollars for said item......

 

Back to,original topic. I really don want to be classified can't I just play with mud.........

 

I'm with. Doc. Carefull making hobbies into work. It can suck the joy and passion right out of it.

 

But if I had to choose art and production. I'd choose art.

 

 

Ps . Keep,the drama coming........

 

 

The Pollock discussion was a good one because it is a wonderful example of confusing art with collecting. One has very very little to do with the other and that is proved by the fact that said painting in the Pollock discussion was either worth about $5 or $5,000,000 depending on who did it, not its artistic value. As something to collect that makes sense, but as an art object it shouldn't matter who painted it.... Calling your art a hobby can also suck the joy and passion right out of it.

 

Jim

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×