Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi Guys. What is the latest changes on G 200 and or the HP? 

I saw some Spanish Feldspar somewhere at $3 per lb, which is way over what I would like to spend. I know Custer and the soda spars that is available, but before I make the final changes to some porcelain clay recipes, I would like to look at all the possible options. Thanks for any information. 

Antoinette

TeachinArt.com

PorcelainbyAntoinette

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Glazenerd. That was quick. I see the biggest differences is in the Calcium and the Magnesium. I wonder how much I should worry about that or if I must find something in addition to fill the deficiency up. Whiting maybe in small percentages, or dolomite that contain both calcium and magnesium. 

 

http://teachinart.com/index.html

http://www.porcelainbyantoinette.com/index.html

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It all depends what your goal is in porcelain. I keep the elemental metal oxides on the very low side.

 

Bar 3 at the top has magnesium causing a grey hue.

Bar 5 has higher levels of titanium.

 

Calcium does make a good floc for porcelain, but you need very little to do the job. All my porcelain recipes have a straight 1% whiting addition. To keep the body high white, then elemental oxides must be kept very low. You can blend your fluxes as well: 50/50 Nep Sy & Mahavir if you like to balance the KNaO. High levels of sodium will cause it to dry a bit quicker, and high levels of potassium will off-gas more so than sodium.

 

Happy Formulating-

Nerd

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks. Just have to shake the gray matter in my brain around again. Just finished with a series of tests with the 200HP. It is frustrating when materials change so fast. 
I try to stay away from natrium based materials. Neph Sye is one of them. I prefer shorter clay over thixotropic clay. 

Will let you know if something comes of it. 

http://teachinart.com/index.html

PorcelainbyAntoinette

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thixotropy used in conjunction with clay body makes me smile. Another one of those pottery world expressions that I have yet to comprehend its use.

 

Get some poorly formulated cone 6 porcelain.......... throw with it with some added water.... don't keep anything........ put the pots and the throwing slop in a container.........let it sit a while.... reclaim it... and try to use it again on the wheel.  ;)

 

best,

 

....................john

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Also hard to carve. As the solubles settle to gel, nothing works until the particles get heated again. When I was teaching in Europe in 2016, someone gave me a piece of Mont Blanc porcelain. I managed to throw a small piece, but when I tried to trim it, it broke the foot like hard toffee that dropped on the floor!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nothing wrong with Custer feldspar  it has 72.47 silica 15.24% alumina and 10.87KN so you need less silica in the porcelain. and its cheep , I do use mahivar as well they must float out the siica because it has only 67% silica and 17.5 alumina and 14.5 KN but its expensive 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmm, worth looking into the Custer too. Some years back it was said that the g 200 was more pure.  I just compared the two and it seems that the Custer is even less complicated.  Someone said it changed,; I wonder if I still have the old one.........bought mine about 10+ years ago. 

Thanks Kaolinwasher.......I will check and definitely consider testing that in a recipe or 2 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have heard that it changed from a lot of folks, but who has actually had it tested?  Pacer claims that it is very consistent on their website:

http://www.pacerminerals.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/Feldspar_Tech_Data_Clarification.pdf
http://www.pacerminerals.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/FELDSPAR-200-325-Tech-Data.pdf


also see digitalfire materials database/plainsman clays:  https://digitalfire.com/4sight/material/custer_feldspar_253.html

 

Hmm, worth looking into the Custer too. Some years back it was said that the g 200 was more pure.  I just compared the two and it seems that the Custer is even less complicated.  Someone said it changed,; I wonder if I still have the old one.........bought mine about 10+ years ago. 

Thanks Kaolinwasher.......I will check and definitely consider testing that in a recipe or 2 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks guys. Just received a bag of each "current" custer and mahavir. Will start testing next week. I am interested in a very white translucent workable porcelain clay body, with as little bentones in it as possible. It seems like I ran into a gold pot of gurus!

Will keep you posted. 

anchorman likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×