Jump to content

Girts

Members
  • Content count

    67
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Girts last won the day on March 15 2016

Girts had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

32 Excellent

About Girts

  • Rank
    Member
  • Birthday 02/09/1946

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Crediton, UK
  • Interests
    photography, architecture, books
  1. Like Nerd, I've been following this avidly. Not because I can add advice, but because I've just done my first work with porcelain. I don't do any throwing - it's all handbuilding - but some of the advice is still helpful. Such as working quickly; I saw for myself how quickly it dries. Interestingly, of my first four pieces (all experimental - what else could they be) one split and fell apart while it was drying. It was made of five pieces and every single one of them tore significantly. And most of the joins failed as well. It was so thorough in its collapse I have to laugh and say I learnt a lot from that one! The others worked well, although I expected those to split as well. So there seems to be more unpredictable behaviour from it than from stoneware. That's OK, it goes with the reputation. Smoothing with a sponge is a great tip. Thanks from me as well for all this advice! Girts
  2. I certainly prefer the bisque version. It emphasises the shapes and textures, and the sculptural quality. I think the shapes are so strong they get confusing when colours are added. Fantastic - literally! Girts
  3. That's good - I think😊! Girts
  4. That's not quite accurate, about distortion being least at smallest aperture. It will give greatest depth of field which means more of the subject will be in sharp focus - which is not the same as distortion. Photographically, distortion is a changing of the shape. Like a building seems to taper as you look up it. To minimise distortion, you need to be as far away from your subject as is feasible, then use the lens to fill the frame. So using your kit lens at its 55mm setting should give you a good result, whereas the 18mm will give you distortion whatever the aperture. It would be interesting to try it with the telephoto attachment when you have the time. It might give excellent results - if you have the space to be far enough away. Girts
  5. Ummm... I actually am GG. And I haven't been formally introduced to any of you guys and flatly deny having been used in any way! 😉 Girts (Gailans)
  6. John, this is exactly what I think an artist's statement should be: informative, adding to the understanding of the background to your work. What I take issue with, and you have avoided completely, is the meaningless pretentious use of obscure wording simply to satisfy the 'write 500 words about your work' requirement. Well done! I like it! Girts
  7. Pretty good! Definitely a sense of scale, and of lifestyle. My only comment (as a former advertising photographer) is the lighting needs a little attention. You're right to not have the sun on the front of the object as it would be too bright and lose the modelling. But because the sun is so bright, the front of the mugs is in deep shadow. So you need a fill light. The easiest way to do that is to use a piece of white card held or propped up on the side you want lightened. You can see the effect immediately and move it around or angle it to get the modelling and brightness you want. A cheap, very effective, and highly professional solution to the problem. Wel done! Girts
  8. How long before firing? Twelve years ago, I went to a pottery for a half hour 'experience' session. You had to pay extra for firing, and I didn't think my pots were worth it. They were not tall, slim, thin, elegant, almost transparent. So I just put them away and left them. I re-discovered them a few months ago when I got my kiln, blew the dust off them and thought exactly the same as you did. Is that too long? But I decided to take a chance - at least they'd be thoroughly dry - and bisqued them. No problem. So I glazed them. And they're great! And, as a bonus, I now see I was so wrong with my initial opinion about their quality. Girts
  9. My own clay journey has been a very short one so far - only a matter of months. But in that brief period I've experienced no frustration because my skills are developing and failure is what I expect. So anything that comes out right is exciting and uplifting. Everything is an experiment - which is exciting. The magic of glazes changing from subtle variations on a theme of sludge to beautiful rich bottomless pools of glowing colour is infinitely inspiring. The results of my experiments are rewarding, even when they turn out not quite as I expected, and progress in any area brings a glow inside. So I can honestly say that it has been an exciting journey so far; one that feeds my soul and fires my imagination. And one that I believe will take me far. Girts
  10. There'll still be someone expecting the toy to be included, like they used to do with plastic submarines in breakfast cereal packets. All that baking powder... Girts
  11. I don't think anyone's bashing intellectualism - I'm certainly not. I take a poor view of dumbing down. What we're all bashing, I think, is pseudo intellectualism. We've all heard it from union leaders, football managers, sales people and politicians. Artists should be producing art which should, in my opinion, speak for itself. I have no problem with someone saying that this piece was inspired by nature (most things are, so honesty is good) or by a walk in a foggy day in the city or whatever. That's interesting. But the kind of stuff that goes on at length about existential reality or other long-winded splurges really is a waste of time and an insult to the viewer. Michelangelo and Rembrandt and da Vinci and co. didn't need to do this. Where did it come from? Sorry, but I just had to get it out of my system. Maybe there's an artwork to be made inspired by the existential reality of artsy babble? Could that be Challenge no.6 ? Girts
  12. Agreed. If you've got to explain it, you've failed. In my opinion. Girts
  13. I agree with you Chris. Pricing by weight has to be a nonsense. Looking at my early pieces, they weigh a ton, but look not that wonderful. My latest pieces look excellent but weigh considerably less than the old ones. So does it make sense to price them by weight? I don't think so. Pricing by comparable work has to be the only realistic way. In effect, what the market will support. So I'd say ask your professor for guidance and look at local shops, online, wherever work like yours is being sold. Girts
  14. Certainly not an information dump! Very informative and full of useful information that I for one will be using very shortly as I attempt some large (relatively) flat pieces. The chances of disaster are high, but this will help. Thanks Nerd - always interesting to hear your insights. Girts
×